| |
| |
 |
| |
2006
Click
here for more ARFF news releases. |
| |
|
| |
For
Immediate Release: May 30, 2007
Government
Announces End to Breeding of Chimpanzees for Research
Animal rights activists urge Scripps to abandon its use of
chimps
Animal
welfare advocates celebrated an announcement by the National Institutes
of Health that it would no longer financially support the breeding
of chimpanzees for research, a decision that in effect ends the
breeding of government-owned chimpanzees. Approximately 500 of
the 1,200 chimpanzees in research laboratories in the United States
are government-owned.
The
Animal Rights Foundation of Florida (ARFF) welcomes the announcement
as a positive step toward a permanent end to the use of great
apes in research in the United States. Unfortunately, although
breeding of chimpanzees for research may be at an end, research
on chimpanzees already living in laboratories will continue.
ARFF
has sent a letter to Richard Lerner, President, The Scripps Research
Institute urging the institute to commit not to conduct or participate
in research that involves the use of chimpanzees or other great
apes.
“The
writing is on the wall concerning the use of great apes in research,”
said Heather Veleanu, ARFF Managing Director. “Although
it may be years before the final chimpanzee leaves government
labs, we are asking Scripps today to end its participation in
invasive experiments involving chimpanzees or other great apes.”
The
Scripps Research Institute, which is constructing a new facility
in Florida, continues to use these complex animals in experiments.
For example, Dr. Francis Chisari, Head of Scripps’ Division
of Experimental Pathology, has been infecting chimpanzees with
the hepatitis B and C viruses since the 1970s.
Opposition
to the use of great apes in invasive research is widespread, even
in the scientific community. The United States is one of the few
remaining countries to use chimpanzees in biomedical research.
Many countries around the world, including Great Britain, New
Zealand, Sweden, and The Netherlands, have prohibited research
on great apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans).
For
more information about animal research at The Scripps Research
Institute, visit www.AnimalRightsFlorida.org/Scripps.
#
# # |
| |
|
| |
For
Immediate Release: April 23, 2007
Animal
Fancier Killed by Camel
Tragedy illustrates need for ban on sale, breeding of exotic
"pets"
(Gulf
County) – On Sunday, April 22, a camel trampled a woman
to death at a property in the City of Wewahitchka. Coincidentally,
a cover story in last week's The Star newspaper (Port St. Joe)
profiled the victim, Cathie Ake, and her husband Donnie. The camel,
named “Polo,” had recently joined other exotic animals
at the Ake's property, including Muntjak deer, coatimundi and
ring-tailed lemurs.
The
Star described the camel’s pitifully small 300 square-foot
enclosure, and Donnie Ake's attempts to train the animal: “Training
staff in hand, Donnie commanded Polo to sit by quickly tapping
its left knee. Polo let out a deep, gurgling noise... and did
its master’s bidding.” In a frightening suggestion,
the article noted that Cathie had hoped to “offer camel
rides to area children.”
Polo
was purchased on March 27 at an exotic animal auction at the Sumter
County Fairgrounds in Bushnell. On the auctioneer’s website,
the camel is offered for sale with the tag line, “Looking
for something Different?” Also for sale to the highest bidder
last month were kinkajou, zebras, flying squirrels, sloths, anteaters
and many other exotic animals native to Africa and South America.
The auction, USA/FLA Exotic Animal Auction, is operated by Bill
McConnell, a Floral City-based breeder of camels. McConnell is
one of hundreds of backyard breeders of exotic animals in Florida.
“The
breeding and sale of exotic animals in Florida is out of control,”
said
Heather Veleanu, ARFF Managing Director.
“This was not the first time that exotic pets have killed
or injured people in Florida, and there will be more incidents
like this unless the State of Florida gets serious about stopping
this cruel trade.”
It
is remarkably easy to purchase exotic animals in Florida—at
animal auctions, pet stores or over the Internet. Buyers are rarely
questioned about whether they have the knowledge or resources
to properly care for the animal(s). Exotic animals may be cute
when purchased, but when they become too large to handle or too
expensive to care for they are often abandoned to suffer in small
barren enclosures or are discarded at an auction.
Exotic
animals are dangerous in captivity and even more so in the event
of an escape. In recent years, there have been dozens of incidents
in Florida in which captive exotic animals have escaped from their
cages or attacked a human being. (A list of recent incidents is
available at ARFF's website— www.animalrightsflorida.org/incidentlist.)
The
Animal Rights Foundation of Florida is demanding a ban on the
sale, and breeding, of exotic animals in Florida, including nonhuman
primates, tigers and other big cats, and large potentially dangerous
animals such as camels.
#
# # |
| |
|
| |
For
Immediate Release: April 20, 2007
The
Shrine Circus: Cruelty to Animals with Every Ticket
Activists urge Shriners to replace circus with non-animal
fundraiser
(Orlando)
– Members of the Animal Rights Foundation of Florida (ARFF)
will gather outside UCF Arena to protest the Shrine
circus. Again this year, Orlando's Bahia Shriners are sponsoring
the Royal Hanneford Circus as their “Shrine Circus.”
The Royal Hanneford Circus has a long and sordid record of poor
animal care and dangerous animal rampages.
PROTEST
DATE: Saturday, April 21
TIMES: 9:30am, 2:00pm, and 6:30pm
PLACE: University of Central Florida arena, Orlando. (Look for
ARFF outside the construction area along Gemini Blvd.)
USDA
inspectors have repeatedly cited the Royal Hanneford Circus for
poor veterinary care. In particular, the circus has been cited
at least seven times over the past 10 years for failing to provide
adequate foot care for two elephants, “Tina” and “Ina.”
Most recently, during a March 2005 inspection, the USDA wrote,
“Most of Tina and Ina’s nails are overgrown and there
is excessive tissue over their cuticles. One of Tina’s nails
has a crack from the outside of her nail to the cuticle.”
Nail infections and other foot problems are painful and potentially
life-threatening conditions common in captive elephants. Ina died
in December 2006; Tina is still with the circus.
Public
Danger. In February 1999, an elephant with the Royal Hanneford
Circus left the ring and ran into the audience during a performance
in Poughkeepsie, New York. Several spectators were injured as
they tried to get away from the elephant.
Don't
the Shriners help children? The Shriners Hospitals for Children
do good work, providing free medical care to needy patients across
the country. But less than 2 percent of the hospitals’ budgets
comes from money raised by Shrine temples. Much of the money raised
by temples through circuses is used not to help children but to
pay for trips, parties and alcohol.
“We
are urging people to reconsider purchasing tickets to the circus.
Watching aging elephants balance on two legs, or muzzled bears
riding bicycles, is a horrible way to spend a Saturday afternoon,”
said Carla Wilson, ARFF Coordinator. “Circus proceeds buy
booze for Shriners; if you want to help children, send a check
to the Shriners Hospitals directly.”
#
# # |
| |
|
| |
For
Immediate Release: January 16, 2007
Circus-Goers
Choose Animal-Free
Ringling Bros.’
Miami Show Cancelled Due to Poor Ticket Sales
(Miami)
– A committed group of animal advocates from the Animal
Rights Foundation of Florida (ARFF) spent the past 10 days, before
and after every one of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey
circus' Miami shows, talking with circus-goers outside the American
Airlines Arena. With video evidence of the violent training sessions
elephants endure as part of regular training, clips of Ringling
trainers aggressively hitting elephants with sharp bullhooks,
and footage of the sad lives circus animals lead in cages or chains,
it wasn’t hard to convince Miamians to think twice before
supporting animal circuses.
Animal
advocates’ efforts were rewarded when families tore up tickets
and left before going into the show, when they came out of shows
having looked at the animals from a new perspective and vowed
never to go to an animal circus again, and finally, on Sunday
night, when Ringling Bros. cancelled its last show because of
low ticket sales.
As
long as Ringling continues to attempt to fill arena stands in
Florida, ARFF members will alert circus-goers to the big top’s
big abuse with literature and a wearable body TV highlighting
the suffering of circus animals. In one clip, viewers can see
trainers repeatedly attacking elephants with steel-tipped bullhooks
and shocking them with electric prods as the animals scream out
in pain. "Tear that foot off! Tear it off! Make ’em
scream!" the trainer instructs other trainers. "Right
here in the barn. You can’t do it on the road. I’m
not gonna touch her in front of a thousand people." Videotape
and testimony from former Ringling trainers and circus employees
reveal that force and abusive training methods are common behind-the-scenes
at Ringling (see circuses.com
for detailed information).
According
to ARFF’s Managing Director, Heather Veleanu, “The
tide is turning. Americans don’t want to support entertainment
that strips animals of their most basic natural characteristics,
deprives them of any semblance of a life similar to what nature
intended, and demands that they be violently beaten to keep them
obedient and afraid.”
Earlier
last week ARFF filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) against Ringling Bros. after representatives of ARFF heard
cicus attendees describing blatant violations of the Animal Welfare
Act. ARFF sent a letter to the USDA urging an investigation into
allegations that tigers appeared to be “drugged” and
were receiving whippings directly in the face. The letter also
describes a lame elephant being forced to perform.
#
# # |
| |
|
| |
For
Immediate Release: November
20, 2006
Trouble at UF Dairy Research Unit
Whistleblower, Investigation Reveals Animal Neglect, Unsafe
Conditions
(Gainesville)
– The Animal Rights Foundation of Florida (ARFF) today filed
a complaint* with the University of Florida alleging mismanagement
and anim
al
neglect at UF’s Dairy Research Unit in Gainesville (13200
NW 59th Drive). ARFF’s complaint is based on allegations
made by a former employee, as well as an investigation by an ARFF
volunteer at the facility in early November. *Copies of ARFF’s
complaint available upon request.
Patricia
Cacace, who worked at the Dairy Research Unit for two years, told
ARFF about serious problems at the facility resulting in unnecessary
animal suffering. Her allegations included:
•
Cows becoming sick after eating screws and wire left behind by
maintenance crews, plastic gloves used in breeding and other improperly
disposed garbage.
•
Cows
suffering life-ending injuries after slipping on poorly maintained
surfaces. Slippery surfaces are a common problem in dairy facilities,
but proper maintenance can reduce the potential of injury. ARFF’s
volunteer noted potential slipping hazards, such as algal build-up
on concrete walkways, as well as several cows with wounds on their
legs, most likely caused by slips.
•
Injured
or sick cows improperly euthanized by a gunshot to the head. Although
gunshot is an industry-accepted method of euthanasia, Ms. Cacace
described how cows were cruelly shot several times before dying
– perhaps due to use of an inappropriate firearm and/or
bullet, or inadequately trained employees.
•
Untreated
illness. Cacace alleged that cows were not treated at first sign
of illness or injury. For example, one cow suffered an eye infection
that went untreated; eventually the eye had to be removed. Another
cow with signs of mastitis was reported to supervisors, but was
not treated; the cow later died of toxic mastitis.
•
Animal
cruelty. Cacace witnessed an incident in which an employee at
the facility whipped an uncooperative cow with his belt. The employee
was scolded, but he was not fired. Deliberate cruelty to animals
should be grounds for immediate dismissal.
•
Hunting.
Cacace told a heartbreaking story of “Ruby,” a particularly
gentle cow who was accidentally shot in the head by a hunter (hunters
are allowed on the property to kill wild
pigs). Cacace described how the cow was left untreated for two
days before a veterinarian arrived.
“Although
these allegations are shocking, the conditions may not be uncommon
in Florida dairy farms,” said Heather Veleanu, ARFF Managing
Director. “What is disappointing is that this farm—operated
by the University of Florida as a teaching facility—should
be far above industry standards, not substandard.”
#
# #
|
| |
|
| |
For
Immediate Release: November 3, 2006
A
Life in Chains – Animal Abuse in the Circus
Activists Plea for Retirement of Circus’ Aging Elephants
(Boca
Raton) – Members of the Animal Rights Foundation of Florida
(ARFF) will gather at the entrance to the Royal Palm Polo Club
to protest the return of exotic animals to the Cole Bros. Circus.
ARFF will be at the circus entrance showing graphic video footage
of the violent training circus elephants endure.
In
2004, after years of protests, the Cole Bros. Circus announced
that elephants would no longer be a part of the traveling show.
Unfortunately, this proved to be only a temporary change. The
circus arrived in Boca Raton this week with its two female Asian
elephants, "Tina" and "Jewel," ages 40 and
42. During its 2006 season, the circus will have over 500 performances
and sometimes travels hundreds of miles between cities. While
traveling, Tina and Jewel are kept chained in a cramped semi-trailer.
PROTEST
DATE: Friday, November 3.
TIME: 6:30pm.
PLACE: Royal Palm Polo Sports Club, 18000 Jog Road, Boca Raton.
The
Cole Bros. Circus has repeatedly refused to retire aging elephants,
even when it is obvious that they are suffering from painful arthritis
or other captivity-induced health problems (conditions linked
to prolonged chaining and lack of proper exercise). In the past
10 years, at least five aging elephants with the Cole Bros. Circus
have died.
Violent,
physical abuse remains a common method of training and controlling
elephants and other animals in the circus. In 2003, the U.S. Department
of Agriculture cited Cole Bros. after a handler struck an elephant
twice with a broom handle. In 2000, USDA inspectors noted that
two Cole Bros. elephants had bullhook scars. In 1999, the USDA
charged Cole Bros. with violating the Animal Welfare Act; USDA
undersecretary Michael Dunn stated, "We believe that on numerous
occasions, employees of the Clyde Beatty-Cole Bros. Circus abusively
used an elephant hook on several animals" (the circus settled
the charges by agreeing to spend $10,000 to improve elephant care).
“Tina
and Jewel deserve retirement at a sanctuary where they will find
freedom from constant travel and physical abuse,” said Heather
Veleanu, ARFF Managing Director.
# # #
|
| |
|
| |
For
Immediate Release: September 26, 2006
Animal
Rights Group Urges Jim Fowler to Make Proposed Animal Park a Sanctuary
(Chipley)
– The Animal Rights Foundation of Florida (ARFF) has proposed
that the “Jim Fowler's Life In The Wild” animal park
be developed as a refuge for animals who have no place else to
go—exotic animals neglected by private owners, or discarded
from zoos, circuses and the entertainment industry.
Although
plans for the animal park in Holmes County have hit a roadblock,
the financial backers of the project have said that it will go
ahead in neighboring Washington County. (In August, the Holmes
County Development Commission terminated its contract with the
Fowler Center to sell hundreds of acres for the park.)
In
August, ARFF sent letters to Mr. Fowler and to Barbara Farris,
President of Blue Dolphin II, the development group supporting
the project.
Every
year, accredited sanctuaries have to turn away hundreds of exotic
and wild animals made homeless by irresponsible owners. Sadly,
animals are also discarded by entertainers and established animal
parks when they are no longer of value.
“We
have no doubt that Mr. Fowler is well aware of the problem of
private ownership of exotic animals,” said ARFF spokesperson
Heather Veleanu. “We are concerned that if Mr. Fowler chooses
to purchase animals to stock his park, it may exacerbate problems
by encouraging captive breeding and the exotic animal trade. The
alternative that we proposed would be welcomed by the general
public and by the animal protection community.”
#
# # |
| |
|
| |
For
Immediate Release: September 18, 2006
Pain & Promise: The Burnham Institute for Medical
Research
(Orlando)
– On August 23, The Burnham Institute for Medical Research
announced that it will open a new research facility in Orlando.
As with the arrival in Palm Beach County of The Scripps Research
Institute, Burnham’s announcement is cause for concern among
animal advocates.
Burnham
uses hundreds, perhaps thousands, of rats and mice in experiments
every year (Burnham does not report its use of mice and rats to
the USDA). Unfortunately, mice and rats are not provided even
minimal protection under federal regulations.
The
Animal Rights Foundation of Florida (ARFF) has created a page
on its website— www.AnimalRightsFlorida.org/Burnham
– with information about Burnham’s use of animals.
Promise.
The Burnham Institute for Medical Research is a leader in the
emerging field of stem cell research. Many believe that stem cells
may some day replace animals in research into many diseases, potentially
saving millions of animals each year from cruel experiments. Stem
cell cultures could generate an endless supply of healthy human
cells for studying disease and testing new drugs.
Pain.
Unfortunately, most stem cell research currently uses animals.
The research of several scientists at Burnham involves transplanting
human cells into “animal models” of injury and disease.
ARFF
has sent a letter to Burnham President John Reed requesting that
Burnham produce publicly available annual reports which include
information about animal research conducted in Florida, including
the number and species of all animals used, as well as details
about how Burnham scientists justify the use of animals, and why
non-animal alternatives were rejected.
“Considering the significant financial support of Burnham
by taxpayers in Florida, and the very real suffering of animals
in research laboratories, a public discussion of this controversial
subject is essential,” said ARFF Managing Director Heather
Veleanu. “We expect Burnham to be completely open about
their use of animals here in Florida.”
#
# # |
| |
|
| |
For
Immediate Release: September 8, 2006
Iguanas
– Targets of Cruel Attacks
Animal Rights Group Offers $1000 Reward Leading to Arrest
of Perpetrator
(Fort Lauderdale)
– In at least three separate incidents in recent weeks,
iguanas along the South Fork Middle River have been attacked by
humans. In the most recent incident, a 6-foot-long iguana that
local residents named “Iggy” was shot with a crossbow
arrow in Wilton Manors. Fortunately, the iguana narrowly escaped
serious injury.
The Animal
Rights Foundation of Florida (ARFF) has pledged a $1000 reward
for information leading to the arrest and conviction of those
responsible for the attacks.
Iguanas, like
all animals, are protected from harassment and inhumane killing
under Florida’s anti-cruelty statute. The perpetrator, if
caught, could face charges of felony animal cruelty.
Experts believe
there is a connection between animal cruelty and human violence.
Individuals who commit acts of intentional cruelty against animals
are a particular concern and may pose a threat to humans.
Although most
people find iguanas fascinating, the animals do sometimes pose
unwelcome challenges. Most often, the complaints are that the
reptiles are eating ornamental plants.
“It
is hard to imagine that loss of an orchid or Hibiscus could warrant
enough anger in an individual to drive him to attack the responsible
animals,” said Heather Veleanu, ARFF’s Managing Director.
“Sadly, iguanas are commonly harassed or worse by human
residents of our state.”
ARFF works
with individuals and municipalities in south Florida to find humane
methods of solving “problems” with iguanas effectively.
ARFF is also
lobbying The Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission
to classify Green iguanas as “reptiles of concern,”
which would require a permit to possess the animals. Licensing
would discourage impulse purchases of iguanas at pet stores, and
help to reduce conflicts between these animals and Florida residents.
(Feral iguanas are descendents of animals who were once pets,
but became too large or expensive to care for, and were irresponsibly
released into the wild.)
#
# # |
| |
|
| |
For
Immediate Release: August 23, 2006
Activists
Speak Against Exotic Pets
(Fort
Lauderdale) – The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FWC) has announced proposed changes to their Captive
Wildlife Regulations. The changes will make it more difficult
to obtain pythons, Anacondas, Nile monitors and other exotic reptiles
(current law only regulates the possession of poisonous reptiles).
The regulations also address minimum requirements for new facilities
housing tigers, lions, monkeys and other exotic wildlife.
The complete list of proposed changes is available at: http://myfwc.com/captive/CaptiveWldlfPublicRegsWorkshop2006.html
The
FWC is hosting workshops to hear from the public about the proposed
changes. The only meeting in south Florida will take place tonight
in Fort Lauderdale:
DATE
AND TIME: Wednesday, August 23, 6:00-8:00pm
LOCATION: Broward County Main Library (100 S. Andrews Avenue),
in Fort Lauderdale
A
representative from the Animal Rights Foundation of Florida will
attend the workshop to speak in support of the proposed regulations,
and to urge the Commission to go further in strengthening the
regulations.
The
new regulations establish a category of “reptiles of concern,”
to include Burmese pythons, Anacondas, Nile monitors, and a few
other exotic reptiles. The new regulations require permits to
possess these reptiles, and establish minimum caging requirements.
Individuals who possess these reptiles will also be required to
implant a small microchip under the skin of the reptiles to identify
them.
ARFF
will request that the FWC's proposed definition of "reptiles
of concern" be amended to include the Green iguana.
“Green
iguanas may not have made as many headlines as pythons,”
said Heather Veleanu, ARFF’s Managing Director. “But
I think if you ask local animal control officers, they'd tell
you that iguanas are of equal, if not larger, concern for residents
of south Florida.”
As
with pythons, the iguana population explosion is a result of the
pet trade. Iguanas can be purchased for as little as $10 at pet
stores. Adding Green iguanas to the list of "reptiles of
concern" would discourage impulse purchases of these animals.
The
regulations also address minimum requirements for facilities housing
tigers, lions, monkeys and other exotic wildlife.
“With
their proposed regulations, it is apparent that the FWC understands
the serious risk that tigers, monkeys and other wild animals pose
to humans,” continued Heather Veleanu. “But we are
frustrated with the piecemeal approach that the FWC takes in safeguarding
the public, and in protecting these animals. We are asking that
the State of Florida prohibit all commercial trade in dangerous
exotic animals.”
#
# # |
| |
|
| |
Click
here for more ARFF news releases. |
| |
|
|
|